
String Theory Illustrated
266,998 views (2012-01-29)Upload date: 2007-02-21⏱ 6:47👍 649 · 👎 669★ 2.97 (522)Howto & Style
Status on YouTube
not checked
not checked yet
In the archive: 2007-05-11 – 2014-04-20.
Sources: Common Crawl 2009-2010, 2012, 2013-20, 2013-48, 2014-10, 2014-15 · YouTube statistics 2007–2008 (SFU) · Web Archive – pages captured in 2007 · Web Archive – pages captured in 2008 · Web Archive – pages captured in 2009 · Web Archive – pages captured in 2010 · YouTube API 2009–2010 (ArchiveTeam crawl)
Download the statistics: CSV · JSON
Sources: Common Crawl 2009-2010, 2012, 2013-20, 2013-48, 2014-10, 2014-15 · YouTube statistics 2007–2008 (SFU) · Web Archive – pages captured in 2007 · Web Archive – pages captured in 2008 · Web Archive – pages captured in 2009 · Web Archive – pages captured in 2010 · YouTube API 2009–2010 (ArchiveTeam crawl)
Download the statistics: CSV · JSON
Appeared on
Listed 181 times in captured pages, on 108 different lists (suggested videos, channels, playlists…). Earliest first:
- Suggested next to: Brain Greene lecturing on quantum physics and string theory · capture of 2007-05-11 · nearest Wayback copy
- Suggested next to: String Theory · capture of 2007-05-16 · this capture in the Wayback Machine
- Suggested next to: Relativity - The Train Paradox (Time Dilation and Length Contraction) · capture of 2007-06-20 · this capture in the Wayback Machine
- Suggested next to: CHANNEL Pilot: Segment 2 of 4 - Quantum Physics&Floating · capture of 2007-06-20 · this capture in the Wayback Machine
- Suggested next to: String Theory · capture of 2007-10-05 · this capture in the Wayback Machine
- Suggested next to: Elegant Universe -- Can String Theory detect God? · capture of 2007-10-07 · this capture in the Wayback Machine
- Channel page:
youtube.com/user/FidesExerc· capture of 2007-10-07 · nearest Wayback copy - Suggested next to: Galaxy fires powerful particle beam at neighbour · capture of 2007-12-23 · this capture in the Wayback Machine
- Suggested next to: Black Hole Fires at Neighboring Galaxy · capture of 2008-04-14 · nearest Wayback copy
- Suggested next to: String Theory to M-Theory · capture of 2008-04-22 · nearest Wayback copy
Description
Are you going to read this? ---------Recently Updated (click down for more)
The following may answer some of your questions and give you some insight.
Chopin's Nocturne in G Minor
The presentation was purely philosophical. The title was used mainly to attract those who view things from a scientific approach.
Many question how the mobius is used in string theory. People shouldn't question me about the use of the mobius. Instead they should pose their questions to highly educated people like Michio Kaku, Georg Cantor, Aurel Wintner, Joseph Polchinski, etc.
Google the term Mobius String Theory and see what you come up with. Read the book String Theory for Dummies by A. Z. Jones and D. Robbins (Part IV: The unseen cosmos on the boundaries of knowledge)
Theists argue with atheists about the existence of god. String Theory experts argue about the mobius strip in string theory. Mathematicians argue about the concept of infinity. I simply found a way to run all of these arguments together in the one concept of G=0 . If the truth be told, I thoroughly enjoy stirring up a hornets nest while sitting back and enjoying the show that ensues.
I only know the basics of string theory. My mathematical skills don't exceed calculus. I'm a middle of the road agnostic when it comes to the 'Proof of God'. My beliefs are one thing and my knowledge is something entirely different. (too often, people try to pass off their beliefs as facts)
Watch Part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdhvnGXySq0
Another avenue of argument I attempted to start (in the comments section) related to being 'Stoned' when I made this. Research the effects of Tetrahydrocannabinol on the human brain and the thought process; Especially when it comes to creativity. Was I under the influence when I thought of the G=0 concept or when made this video presentation? Honestly, what difference does that make?
I believe this world would be a much better place if people knew the difference between fact and belief; If they based their opinions on testable facts rather then superstitions. What has that got to do with the video? Read the comments section and you tell me.
Nearly 3 years after making this video, I'm still enjoying the show, and I'm still convinced that G=0.
:)
RV
Original Links for reference -
http://www.geocities.com/sunjara/mobiusstrip.html
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1159548.1159556&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=263277&CFTOKEN=98378211
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9327%28194604%2968%3A2%3C321%3AASTOTM%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Y&size=LARGE&origin=JSTOR-enlargePage
http://www.quantonics.com/Level_4_QTO_Mobius_Strip_Quanton_Latched_Left.html
The following may answer some of your questions and give you some insight.
Chopin's Nocturne in G Minor
The presentation was purely philosophical. The title was used mainly to attract those who view things from a scientific approach.
Many question how the mobius is used in string theory. People shouldn't question me about the use of the mobius. Instead they should pose their questions to highly educated people like Michio Kaku, Georg Cantor, Aurel Wintner, Joseph Polchinski, etc.
Google the term Mobius String Theory and see what you come up with. Read the book String Theory for Dummies by A. Z. Jones and D. Robbins (Part IV: The unseen cosmos on the boundaries of knowledge)
Theists argue with atheists about the existence of god. String Theory experts argue about the mobius strip in string theory. Mathematicians argue about the concept of infinity. I simply found a way to run all of these arguments together in the one concept of G=0 . If the truth be told, I thoroughly enjoy stirring up a hornets nest while sitting back and enjoying the show that ensues.
I only know the basics of string theory. My mathematical skills don't exceed calculus. I'm a middle of the road agnostic when it comes to the 'Proof of God'. My beliefs are one thing and my knowledge is something entirely different. (too often, people try to pass off their beliefs as facts)
Watch Part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdhvnGXySq0
Another avenue of argument I attempted to start (in the comments section) related to being 'Stoned' when I made this. Research the effects of Tetrahydrocannabinol on the human brain and the thought process; Especially when it comes to creativity. Was I under the influence when I thought of the G=0 concept or when made this video presentation? Honestly, what difference does that make?
I believe this world would be a much better place if people knew the difference between fact and belief; If they based their opinions on testable facts rather then superstitions. What has that got to do with the video? Read the comments section and you tell me.
Nearly 3 years after making this video, I'm still enjoying the show, and I'm still convinced that G=0.
:)
RV
Original Links for reference -
http://www.geocities.com/sunjara/mobiusstrip.html
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1159548.1159556&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=263277&CFTOKEN=98378211
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9327%28194604%2968%3A2%3C321%3AASTOTM%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Y&size=LARGE&origin=JSTOR-enlargePage
http://www.quantonics.com/Level_4_QTO_Mobius_Strip_Quanton_Latched_Left.html
Tags
View history
watch pagelist (suggested, channel, search…)
Captures with a view count: 89 (the watch page and the lists that showed the video).
Archive captures (5)
| Captured | Source | Captured URL | Original | Status | Views | Likes / dislikes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-01-29 | CC 2012 | youtube.com/watch?v=A4LrbAXb4FQ | available | 266,998 | 649 / 669 | |
| 2010-09-26 | Web Archive – pages captured in 2010 | youtube.com/watch?v=A4LrbAXb4FQ&feature=related | available | 199,288 | ||
| 2009-07-25 | YouTube API 2009–2010 (ArchiveTeam crawl) | available | 116,629 | |||
| 2008-09-27 | Web Archive – pages captured in 2008 | youtube.com/watch?v=A4LrbAXb4FQ&feature=related | available | 54,084 | ||
| 2008-04-22 | YouTube statistics 2007–2008 (SFU) | available | 23,800 |
The captured URL is the exact address of the page when it was captured, country host and parameters included. For Common Crawl it opens the record in that crawl's index (WARC file and offset), and the HTML button downloads the page's original code from Common Crawl. For the Web Archive it opens that very capture in the Wayback Machine. The date of a Common Crawl capture opens the nearest Wayback copy of the page.